Re: [HACKERS] [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGehOXE6FfhVbNuJd=NfhwVd3AdE9gEQ8_+4u_Jjs0+aMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Fujitsu was interested in developing a columnar storage extension with minimal
> changes the server backend.
>
> The columnar store is implemented as an extension using index access methods.
> This can be easily enhanced with pluggable storage methods once they are
> available.

Have you see this post from 2015:

        https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150831225328.GM2912%40alvherre.pgsql


Thanks for the information.
Yes, I already checked that mail thread. The proposal in that thread was trying to add
the columnar storage in the core itself. The patch that is proposed is an extension to
provide columnar storage with the help of index.

May be we can discuss the pros and cons in adding columnar store in the core itself
or a pluggable storage approach.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC: Grouped base relation
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal