Re: Logical Replication of sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From shveta malik
Subject Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Date
Msg-id CAJpy0uCBc0gmttQC6QpeYqu0-2pyv+s=nxUUmjAJWaXtmpZ1kA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Logical Replication of sequences  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Re: Logical Replication of sequences
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:26 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this, these issues are fixed in the attached
> > v20240730_2 version patch.
> >

I was reviewing the design of patch003, and I have a query. Do we need
to even start an apply worker and create replication slot when
subscription created is for 'sequences only'? IIUC, currently logical
replication apply worker is the one launching sequence-sync worker
whenever needed. I think it should be the launcher doing this job and
thus apply worker may even not be needed for current functionality of
sequence sync? Going forward when we implement incremental sync of
sequences, then we may have apply worker started but now it is not
needed.

thanks
Shveta



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rajesh Kokkonda
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory growth observed with C++ application consuming libpq.dll on Windows
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: v17 vs v16 performance comparison