Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From shveta malik
Subject Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps
Date
Msg-id CAJpy0uAKG3moYA0pwQoQ2sv1d-S0CmfXsZf_9C_83UqtREaj+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Correction in doc of failover ready steps  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Correction in doc of failover ready steps
List pgsql-docs
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:46 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a query in failover-ready doc referring to
> pg_subscription_rel. Unlike pg_subscription, pg_subscription_rel gives
> results only when connected to the database having the
> subscription(s). If we run the concerned query on any other database,
> it will give incomplete results i.e. it will give info on main slots
> leaving table sync slots (if any).
> Thus the failover-ready steps which queries pg_subscription_rel need
> to mention that the concerned query needs to be run on the database(s)
> that includes the failover enabled subscription(s).  Corrected the doc
> for the same.

On rethinking, since pg_subscription query needs to be run only once
on *any* database to get combined results of all main slots while
pg_subscription_rel query needs to be run on each database having
concerned subscription (and table), does it makes sense to separate
the 2 queries instead of having UNION ? Thoughts?

thanks
Shveta



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Correction in doc of failover ready steps
Next
From: 日向充
Date:
Subject: Re: A minor bug in the doc of "SQL Functions Returning Sets" in xfunc.sgml.