It is client applications and services,NOT client applications and database.
It just term's (client applications, services) misleading.
To the system view,
You should definitely known they are relationship between process and proce=
ss.
Or I could still say some postgres process provide service,and some
postgres process is client.
PG process are just another couple of client and service.
Why my client applications could not get so closer relationship with
services,just like pg's client process and service's process ?
Still,You got no knowledge about "client applications and services".
What you said is your assumption.
Without knowledge, you should consider them equivalent.
PG got no priority.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 16:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Young <yayooo@gmail.com> writes:
>> You got no knowledge about "client applications".
>> What you said is your assumption.
>> Without knowledge, you should consider them equivalent.
>> PG got no priority.
>
> Look, we will explain this once more. =C2=A0Postgres is entitled to assume
> that "localhost" means the local machine; there are Internet standards
> saying so. =C2=A0On the other hand, client applications that assume the
> database server is on the same machine they are on are definitely
> broken, and need to be fixed.
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0regards, tom lane
>
