On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
>
> I think a better option would be shoving it into a backend tuplestore and
> just leaving it there (maybe with a command to clear it for the paranoid).
> That gives a relation you can query against, insert into another table, etc.
> --
This is something I don't know how to do it: in my understanding, a
tuplestore is an internal store, which means it has no name exposed.
Thus we can't reference it later.
Regards,
Qingqing
