On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:40 PM Hou, Zhijie <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When reading the code of rel_max_parallel_hazard_for_modify in 0001.
>
> I thought there are so many places call table_close().
> Personally, It's a little confused to me.
>
> Do you think it's better to do the table_open/close outside of rel_max_parallel_hazard_for_modify ?
>
> Like:
>
> static bool rel_max_parallel_hazard_for_modify(Relation rel,
> CmdType command_type,
> max_parallel_hazard_context *context);
> ...
> Relation relation = table_open(rte->relid, NoLock);
> (void) rel_max_parallel_hazard_for_modify(relation, parse->commandType, &context);
> table_close(relation, NoLock);
>
>
> And we seems do not need the lockmode param with the above define.
>
>
Yeah, the repeated cleanup at the point of return is a bit ugly.
It could be solved by changing the function to do cleanup at a common
return point, but I agree with you that in this case it could simply
be done outside the function.
Thanks, I'll make that change.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
