On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:23 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> While the worker is skipping one of the skip transactions specified by
> the user and immediately if the user specifies another skip
> transaction while the skipping of the transaction is in progress this
> new value will be reset by the worker while clearing the skip xid. I
> felt once the worker has identified the skip xid and is about to skip
> the xid, the worker can acquire a lock to prevent concurrency issues:
That's a good point.
If only the last_error_xid could be skipped, then this wouldn't be an
issue, right?
If a different xid to skip is specified while the worker is currently
skipping a transaction, should that even be allowed?
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
