Re: Weird behavior of INSERT QUERY - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Satalabaha Postgres
Subject Re: Weird behavior of INSERT QUERY
Date
Msg-id CAJ_W8nZNq+bWEAe10VjDRm0n6AM3hQsFZu1D4AULzg9_RND1cA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird behavior of INSERT QUERY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance

Regards,

Satalabha


On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 at 18:56, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Satalabaha Postgres <satalabaha.postgres@gmail.com> writes:
> The select query in the insert returns about 499 rows. However, this insert
> statement when executed from application user i.e. schema1_u takes close to
>  8 minutes. When the same insert statement gets executed as  postgres user
> it takes less than 280 ms. Both the executions use the same execution plan
> with only difference that when schema1_u executes the SQL, we observe
> "Trigger for constraint fk_con_tablea: time=426499.314 calls=499" taking
> more time.

So you need to find out what's happening in the trigger.  Perhaps
auto_explain with auto_explain.log_nested_statements enabled
would give some insight.

I suspect there might be a permissions problem causing schema1_u
to not be allowed to "see" the statistics for table_b, resulting
in a bad plan choice for the FK enforcement query; but that's
just a guess.

                        regards, tom lane


Hi Tom,

We did enable auto_explain and auto_explain.log_nested_statements and apart from the insert statement we couldn't find any other SQL's causing that was taking more time. 

Regards, Satalabaha.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Satalabaha Postgres
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behavior of INSERT QUERY
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behavior of INSERT QUERY