Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date
Msg-id CAJVSVGXhmtv3TLFJD76+DH+-xSOXd=bO-4Jj12hJJzc4e484mg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/6/19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I've pushed that version (v8 + max_kw_len); if the buildfarm doesn't
> fall over, we can move on with looking at hashing.

Thank you. The API adjustment looks good, and I'm glad that splitting
out the aux info led to even further cleanups.

-John Naylor


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)