Perfomance 9.1.9 vs 9.4.1 - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Alexander Uspensky
Subject Perfomance 9.1.9 vs 9.4.1
Date
Msg-id CAJSSGvLJjcZeU4ANXuLDrJxDtk383vhTiPt5QuWTM0W-0LYfuQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Perfomance 9.1.9 vs 9.4.1  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-sql
Dear,

I am comparing 9.1.9 and 9.4.1. I think that perfomance of 9.4.1 should be better.
But I have an issue here.
I have installed both db on the same machine and I have 2 results,
where I see that for some reason 9.1.9 works faster - 118ms vs 452ms.
I checked the same sql query with EXPLAIN ANALYZE (with the same work_mem =8MB and shared_buffers = 128MB).
Could you please help me what should I do to solve it?

1) 9.1.9
Limit  (cost=6435.41..6435.41 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=118.720..118.723 rows=25 loops=1)
   ->  Sort  (cost=6435.41..6435.41 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=118.719..118.720 rows=25 loops=1)
...
 Total runtime: 118.921 ms
(48 rows)

2) 9.4.1
Limit  (cost=507.65..507.66 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=452.124..452.127 rows=25 loops=1)
   ->  Sort  (cost=507.65..507.66 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=451.760..451.760 rows=25 loops=1)
...
 Planning time: 3.406 ms
 Execution time: 452.297 ms
(51 rows)

--
Best regards, Alexander

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: bricklen
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange Query - Reg
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Perfomance 9.1.9 vs 9.4.1