Re: autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez
Subject Re: autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit
Date
Msg-id CAJP2v3GZB+je6UOD1+8-5OXEkRXSezhoCUj9Vm=auHA1Emjo5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit  (Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez <garcortez@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Thank you comments

El sáb, 10 abr 2021 a las 3:28, Laurenz Albe (<laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) escribió:
On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 21:50 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Apr-10, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 14:19 -0600, Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez wrote:
> > > Hi community I have a question about autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit
> > >   I want to increase this parameter I have read on internet that value
> > >   It could have as maximum 10,000 but I want to know, what will it be the troubles if I did that change
> >
> > That will keep PostgreSQL from functioning properly.
> > I would never increase the setting beyond the 20ms that were the
> > default before v12.
>
> I think you're confusing it with autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay.  He is
> asking about the cost_limit.  Increasing that setting will mean that the
> 20ms sleeps will occur much less frequently.

Yes, indeed.  Sorry.

Increasing "autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit" will make autovacuum run faster.
There is no problem with increasing it as much as you want.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com



--
Ing. Henry G. Cortez



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Henry Francisco Garcia Cortez
Date:
Subject: autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit
Next
From: Lars Aksel Opsahl
Date:
Subject: COPY big row returns ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size