Re: [GENERAL] Question slow query - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Patrick B
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Question slow query
Date
Msg-id CAJNY3ivMc5TBb1mLfp2yG0=teRVUnA1=CYNiw0+PYYQw_Gjs9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Question slow query  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Question slow query
Re: [GENERAL] Question slow query
List pgsql-general


2017-01-12 16:48 GMT+13:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>:
På torsdag 12. januar 2017 kl. 03:15:59, skrev Patrick B <patrickbakerbr@gmail.com>:
Hi guys,
 
I've got a slow query, running at 25 seconds.
 
                          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on ja_notes r_1103088  (cost=234300.55..1254978.62 rows=553275 width=101) (actual time=1423.411..10572.549 rows=475646 loops=1)                               Recheck Cond: (n_type = ANY ('{note,note_1,note_2}'::n_type[]))                               Filter: (timezone('Etc/UTC'::text, d_modified) >= '2016-08-07 23:12:34'::timestamp without time zone)                               Rows Removed by Filter: 13725231
 
 
As you can see, 13.725.231 rows were removed by Filter..
 
Should I create an index for this column?
d_modified              | timestamp with time zone | default statement_timestamp()

I tried but it didn't help... the query doesn't even hit the index.

 

CREATE INDEX q ON test USING BTREE (d_modified);

 

Am I missing something? 

 
Yes, you've not shown us:
1. The query
2. The schema
3. Complete EXPLAIN-output
 

Sorry about that.. just wanted to understand how to index a timestamp column. I was able to do this way:

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY ON note (timezone('Etc/UTC'::text, d_date));

Cheers
Patrick

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Building PL/Perl procedural language without --with-perl configure flag
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Are new connection/security features in order,given connection pooling?