Re: Strange behaviour on function - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lorusso Domenico
Subject Re: Strange behaviour on function
Date
Msg-id CAJMpnG5bOOqmb1BAW=48osLLY_mFDhV_sEz21t9=MYYmmx_Exw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange behaviour on function  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
List pgsql-general
Erik, Adrian,

The trigger function is very long and complex (and not yet well documented), but bind_action is a normal function callable everywhere, the problem as discovered by Erik was in the null value contained in the hstore.

Anyway, when the ecosystem of functions will work correctly I can share, so you can give me how improve :-D


Il giorno mer 5 lug 2023 alle ore 17:33 Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> ha scritto:
> On 05/07/2023 17:16 CEST Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-trigger.html
>
> 1)
> "A trigger function must return either NULL or a record/row value having
> exactly the structure of the table the trigger was fired for."
>
> 2) I am not seeing where you use:
>
> "TG_ARGV[]
>
>      Data type array of text; the arguments from the CREATE TRIGGER
> statement. The index counts from 0. Invalid indexes (less than 0 or
> greater than or equal to tg_nargs) result in a null value."
>
> So I don't see how sqlstr is being set?

Domenico did not provide the trigger definition, only function bind_action
which he calls from a trigger function.  Also bind_action cannot be a trigger
function because it does not return trigger.

--
Erik


--
Domenico L.

per stupire mezz'ora basta un libro di storia,
io cercai di imparare la Treccani a memoria... [F.d.A.]

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lorusso Domenico
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour on function
Next
From: aarthi rajagopal
Date:
Subject: Need help