On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> $ ./pg_archivecleanup -x "bz2" /tmp 000000010000000100000058
>>
>> Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional.
>> Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch
>> will complain about that either; or at least I don't see why the
>> behavior should be any different.
>
> Can someone enlighten me on this point?
>
mmm! you're right... it's not complaining either... i was sure it was...
and i'm not sure i want to contor things for that...
so, just forget my last mail about that... your refactor is just fine for me
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
