On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 13.01.2012 06:24, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> gistVacuumUpdate was removed when old-style VACUUM FULL was removed.
>> i wonder why.
>> it was not practical and REINDEX is preferred?
>>
>> anyway, the removal seems incomplete and there are some leftovers:
>> F_TUPLES_DELETED
>> F_DELETED
>> XLOG_GIST_PAGE_DELETE
>
>
> Hmm, in theory we might bring back support for deleting pages in the future,
> I'm guessing F_DELETED and the WAL record type were left in place because of
> that.
I guess it was an oversight, because GistPageSetDeleted() is being
used in gistRedoPageDeleteRecord() and GistPageIsDeleted() in a few
other places
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
