On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment:
> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It
> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store
> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand?
>
fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the
info locally and send it on demand.
about the _short_desc functions, i added that because i wanted to
understand what was happening during recovery and the wal_record_type
(xl_info) being a number is not that clear
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
