Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog
Date
Msg-id CAJKUy5ghp-T04Y5jVchBiSTgRJENZ=8JNrYbTMPf=_Qi6BivCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>> synchronous_standby_names='*' is prone to such confusion in general, but it
>> seems that it's particularly surprising if a running pg_basebackup lets a
>> commit in synchronous replication to proceed. Maybe we just need a warning
>> in the docs. I think we should advise that synchronous_standby_names='*' is
>> dangerous in general, and cite this as one reason for that.
>
> Hmm. i think this is common enough that we want to make sure we avoid
> it in code.
>
> Could we pass a parameter from the client indicating to the master
> that it refuses to be a sync slave? An optional keyword to the
> START_REPLICATION command, perhaps?
>

can't you execute "set synchronous_commit to off/local" for this connection?

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated version of pg_receivexlog