<p><br /> El 03/10/2012 21:38, "Tom Lane" <<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>> escribió:<br
/>><br /> > Does anyone have an objection to this? I can imagine cases where the<br /> > check would reject
valuesthat would get accepted at runtime, if the<br /> > type's input function was sensitive to the phase of the
moonor<br /> > something. But it doesn't seem very probable, whereas checking the<br /> > value seems like an
eminentlyuseful thing to do. Or maybe I'm just<br /> > overreacting to the report --- I can't recall any previous
complaints<br/> > like this, so maybe entering a bogus initcond is a corner case too.<p>I guess a wrong initcond
value,probably is a pilot error. <br /> So, my first reaction is +1 to make it an error.<br /><br /> But if you feel
therea corner cases maybe at least a warning<p>--<br /> Jaime Casanova<br /> 2ndQuadrant: Your PostgreSQL partner <br
/>
