Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Borodin
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Date
Msg-id CAJEAwVEWvgSJ0Vgt-RUo58PmhOb1J2dt_bJGE+w9g3QwbP-C0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_background contrib module proposal  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
2016-12-19 4:21 GMT+05:00 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>:
> Couldn't it sleep in increments smaller than a second?  Like maybe
> milliseconds?  Also, it's probably cleaner (or at least more
> comprehensible) to write something using format() and dollar quoting
> than the line with the double 's.

Right. Here's version which waits for half a second. I do not see how
to path doubles via dollar sign, pg_background_launch() gets a string
as a parameter, it's not EXCEUTE USING.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] invalid combination of options "-D - -F t -X stream" in pg_basebackup