Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Amit Bondwal
Subject Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support.
Date
Msg-id CAJ=k2iGognT_yyXJx+v47HmEf7FhgF6hs6fQGUnR8XLWBS3pug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support.  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks you very much Craig for clearing these facts and sorry for mail sent only to you by mistake.


--
Thanks & Regards,

Amit Bondwal


On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 17 July 2015 at 19:37, Amit Bondwal <bondwal.amit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much all of you for quick response and clearing my mind.

Please reply to the mailing list, not just to me directly.

> One more question, can I run a databse of postgres 9.4 on postgres-XL
> cluster?

postgres-XL is based on PostgreSQL 9.2, so no.

Postgres-XL doesn't "run on" PostgreSQL. It's a modified (forked)
version of PostgreSQL.

> Or you can advise me any better solution.

Not without knowing a lot more about what you're trying to do, what
your requirements are, etc.

> As per my knowledge partitioning
> of a table have some limits in nos. and I can't extend more storage in a
> server upto a limit.

Yes, that's true, but those limits are quite large, and you may be
trying to solve a problem you don't and won't have.

This may well be premature optimisation. I can't know without a lot more info.

Rather than starting with the solution (horizontal partitioning,
sharding) try starting with the problem and requirements, then looking
for solutions from there.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Is BDR support distributed table on slave nodes with ACID and join support.
Next
From: Melvin Davidson
Date:
Subject: Re: Backup fatal issue