Re: XLogCtl->ckptFullXid is unused - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: XLogCtl->ckptFullXid is unused
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TPUnfaNV5rWoh_qzT7uo7ZHX-pvNRj+Y6LbEkfELN1gRA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to XLogCtl->ckptFullXid is unused  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: XLogCtl->ckptFullXid is unused
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Nathan,

> I just noticed $SUBJECT.  This seems to be an oversight in commit 2fc7af5,
> which simultaneously combined ckptXidEpoch and ckptXid into ckptFullXid and
> removed the only use of that information, i.e., GetNextXidAndEpoch().  Any
> objections if I remove it now?

Good catch. I don't see any reason why we might want to keep ckptFullXid. Also I checked if there are any references left to this field - there are none.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends