Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TOnCgvK-HNZ5yRDa6kCidut6O0-SooJqFubtfJBMgxLzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB
List pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

Here is the rebased version of the patch.

> I invite anyone interested to join this effort as a co-author! (since,
> honestly, rewriting the same feature over and over again alone is
> quite boring :D).

> Overall structure could look like this:
> pg_dict
>    |
>    |---- dictionary 1 meta
>    |           |--name
>    |           |--size
>    |           |--etc
>    |           |--dictionary table name (i.e. pg_dict_16385)
>    |                  |
>    |                  |----> pg_dict_16385
>    |
>    |---- dictionary 2 meta
>    |           |--name
>    |           |--size
>    |           |--etc
>    |           |--dictionary table name (i.e. pg_dict_16386)
>    |                  |
>    |                  |----> pg_dict_16386

For the record, Nikita and I agreed offlist that Nikita will join this
effort as a co-author in order to implement the suggested improvements
(and perhaps some improvements that were not suggested yet). Meanwhile
I'm going to keep the current version of the patch up to date with the
`master` branch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Next
From: "kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship