Hi,
> > On Feb 19, 2025, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> > The opposite, which was discussed at length at FOSDEM, was to ask authors to
> > click a single button once a month at most. If that level of engagement is too
> > much to ask then maybe said authors should question why they in return ask
> > others to spend hours reviewing?
>
> Exactly this.
True, but didn't we just discover that it doesn't work?
"""
There's a bunch that are still not moved, that I know should be moved. [...]
"""
I agree about the fact that "no interest" status might be a bit too
judgmental. There might be interest but no time. Perhaps something
like "no activity" or "closed due to inactivity" would be more
appropriate / neutral. We should also emphasise in the emails that the
author is free to reopen the entry if he/she believes it was closed by
mistake.
I also agree that we should account for feature freezes.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
