Re: new commitfest transition guidance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNuctF4WR3=_Do3d9k8esKNap6m193YE1oEWJb3ADZjtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new commitfest transition guidance  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> I think this sounds much more reasonable than what's happening now.
> But I think we need to make the flow a bit more clear:
> 1. Add a "no interest" reason for closing.
> 2. Add a label[2]/column that specifies that an entry will be closed
> as "no interest" automatically at the end of this CF, e.g. a "pending
> no interest" label.
> 3. If at the end of a commitfest a patch has had 3 or more months
> without any emails, it automatically gets that "pending no interest"
> label.
> 4. Anyone subscribed to emails for this patch will get notified about
> that change.
> 5. If a patch is Ready for Committer and has a committer assigned,
> never add this label.
> 6. At the end of the commitfest, move all patches without that label.
> And close all patches with such a label.

Sounds perfect to me.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ilia Evdokimov
Date:
Subject: Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: new commitfest transition guidance