Hi,
> I think it would be better to just remove the "consensus" part of your
> mail, and just put down the real reason why each patch is being RfC-ed
> or rejected. That is, don't imply that there are hackers that OK-ed it
> when there are none, and inform patch authors directly about the
> reasons why the patch is being revoked; so without "see consensus in
> [0]".
That's fair enough. I will use "It's been decided" or something like
this next time to avoid any confusion.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
