Hi Andres,
> > So to clarify, are we talking about tuple-level compression? Or
> > perhaps page-level compression?
>
> Tuple level.
> although my own patch proposed attribute-level compression, not
> tuple-level one, it is arguably closer to tuple-level approach than
> page-level one
Just wanted to make sure that by tuple-level we mean the same thing.
When saying tuple-level do you mean that the entire tuple should be
compressed as one large binary (i.e. similarly to page-level
compression but more granularly), or every single attribute should be
compressed separately (similarly to how TOAST does this)?
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
