Re: Unnecessary smgropen in {heapam_relation,index}_copy_data? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: Unnecessary smgropen in {heapam_relation,index}_copy_data?
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TMNwD8Hi1DCNNBqE0LpmVWaGXdbr65T22XcxAotewyFcg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Unnecessary smgropen in {heapam_relation,index}_copy_data?  (Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unnecessary smgropen in {heapam_relation,index}_copy_data?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> I find heapam_relation_copy_data() and index_copy_data() have the following code:
>
>         dstrel = smgropen(*newrlocator, rel->rd_backend);
>
>         ...
>
>         RelationCreateStorage(*newrlocator, rel->rd_rel->relpersistence, true);
>
> The smgropen() is also called by RelationCreateStorage(), why should we call
> smgropen() explicitly here?
>
> I try to remove the smgropen(), and all tests passed.

That's a very good question. Note that the second argument of
smgropen() used to create dstrel changes after applying your patch.
I'm not 100% sure whether this is significant or not.

I added your patch to the nearest open commitfest so that we will not lose it:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4794/


-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support