On 8/15/23 23:48, Olivier Gautherot wrote:El mié, 16 ago 2023 5:39, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> escribió: On 8/15/23 04:24, Olivier Gautherot wrote: [snip] Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?Faster storage can only help but I would start by discarding functional overhead. Functional overhead?I mean inefficient design, which won't be solved by changing the storage. Ah, the normal aspects of physical design...
El mié, 16 ago 2023 5:39, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> escribió: On 8/15/23 04:24, Olivier Gautherot wrote: [snip] Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?Faster storage can only help but I would start by discarding functional overhead. Functional overhead?I mean inefficient design, which won't be solved by changing the storage.
On 8/15/23 04:24, Olivier Gautherot wrote: [snip] Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?Faster storage can only help but I would start by discarding functional overhead. Functional overhead?
Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?Faster storage can only help but I would start by discarding functional overhead.
Does the database have to be on a storage like EMC or QNAP?
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
