Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Khandekar
Subject Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files
Date
Msg-id CAJ3gD9ecYNGv5PScwjJ-XcY=EngSbWUp7QrD5HwytY-V=QpKxQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files  (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>)
Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 13:10, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> See comment in pgunlink() "We need to loop because even though
> PostgreSQL uses flags that allow unlink while the file is open, other
> applications might have the file
> open without those flags.".  Can you once see if there is any flag
> that you have missed to pass to allow this?

> If there is nothing we
> can do about it, then we might need to use some different API or maybe
> define a new API that can handle this.

There were objections against modifying the vfd api only for this
replication-related use-case. Having a new API will require all the
changes required to enable the virtual FDs feature that we need from
vfd. If nothing works out from the FILE_SHARE_DELETE thing, I am
thinking, we can use VFD, plus we can keep track of per-subtransaction
vfd handles, and do something similar to AtEOSubXact_Files().


-- 
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE