Re: cross-platform pg_basebackup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From davinder singh
Subject Re: cross-platform pg_basebackup
Date
Msg-id CAHzhFSH92VGDZc=iRFi8qA0PvcobuL_+bYCcTmbOLpMK=y9ygQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cross-platform pg_basebackup  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: cross-platform pg_basebackup  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,
Patch v2 looks good to me, I have tested it, and pg_basebackup works fine across the platforms (Windows to Linux and Linux to Windows).
Syntax used for testing
$ pg_basebackup -h remote_server_ip -p 5432 -U user_name -D backup/data -T olddir=newdir
 
I have also tested with non-absolute paths, it behaves as expected.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:42 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

On 2022-10-20 Th 14:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Cool. Here's a patch.
>> LGTM, except I'd be inclined to ensure that all the macros
>> are function-style, ie
>>
>> +#define IS_DIR_SEP(ch) IS_NONWINDOWS_DIR_SEP(ch)
>>
>> not just
>>
>> +#define IS_DIR_SEP IS_NONWINDOWS_DIR_SEP
>>
>> I don't recall the exact rules, but I know that the second style
>> can lead to expanding the macro in more cases, which we likely
>> don't want.  It also seems like better documentation to show
>> the expected arguments.
> OK, thanks. v2 attached.
>


Looks good.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com





--
Regards,
Davinder

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Standby recovers records from wrong timeline