On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 7:51:24 am Greg Donald wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> > Wonder if it is related to this:
>> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-11/msg00098.php
>>
>> None of my sequences are named 'new'. What do you mean?
>
> I was thinking of the more generic case. The problem with 'new' in the above bug
> is that it is a reserved word and the list of reserved words recognized by
> pg_dump changed in 9.0 or 9.1(?). If the table definitions you showed are correct
> you have sequence columns named id. id is in the list of reserved words also:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html
hm -- if sequences named 'id' are not dumping properly, I'd call that
a pretty significant bug.
merlin
