On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is that defined in the standard?
>
> RETURNING isn't even defined in the standard.
Right: Point being, assumptions based on implementation ordering are
generally to be avoided unless they are explicitly defined in the
standard or elsewhere.
merlin