Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0y52D2b8-qANLi0woHx-7Ubxfp7gTgZ3Oxkz=USH2F2Xg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows  (Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 14:53, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is that defined in the standard?
>
> RETURNING isn't even defined in the standard.

Right: Point being, assumptions based on implementation ordering are
generally to be avoided unless they are explicitly defined in the
standard or elsewhere.

merlin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Deprecating RULES
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce palloc's in numeric operations.