On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:40 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> master zedstore/pglz zedstore/lz4
> -------------------------------------------------
> copy 1855 68092 2131
> dump 751 905 811
>
> And the size of the lineitem table (as shown by \d+) is:
>
> master: 64GB
> zedstore/pglz: 51GB
> zedstore/lz4: 20GB
>
> It's mostly expected lz4 beats pglz in performance and compression
> ratio, but this seems a bit too extreme I guess. Per past benchmarks
> (e.g. [1] and [2]) the difference in compression/decompression time
> should be maybe 1-2x or something like that, not 35x like here.
I can't speak to the ratio, but in basic backup/restore scenarios pglz
is absolutely killing me; Performance is just awful; we are cpubound
in backups throughout the department. Installations defaulting to
plgz will make this feature show very poorly.
merlin
