Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0x_iabu=D6LGspCgeWmA9kGwHNnAODK=gHrAkg2dtZoeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> output type. For other aggregates (like avg()) the remote nodes will have to
> return the transient state value in an appropriate form (maybe bytea type),
> which does not depend on PG version.

Hm, that seems like an awful lot of work (new version agnostic
serialization format) for very little benefit (version independent
type serialization for remote aggregate pushdown).  How about forcing
the version to be the same for the feature to be used?

merlin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Antonin Houska
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 【ECPG】strncpy functiondoes not set the end character '\0'