Re: jsonb and nested hstore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0wpq+aN9EQZdVc3qC2cp_qeZBmzqwYtCxWyDFC-mQdY6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb and nested hstore  (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: jsonb and nested hstore
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> send/recv functions are also needed for binary-format COPY. IMHO jsonb must
> have send/recv functions. All other built-in types have them, except for
> types like 'smgr', 'aclitem' and 'any*' that no-one should be using as
> column types.

Yes -- completely agree.  I also consider the hstore functionality (in
particular, searching and access operators) to be essential
functionality.

I'm actually surprised we have an alternate binary wire format for
jsonb at all; json is explicitly text and I'm not sure what the use
case of sending the internal structure is.  Meaning, maybe jsonb
send/recv should be a thin wrapper to sending the json string.   The
hstore send/recv I think properly covers the case where client side
binary wire format actors would want to manage performance critical
cases that want to avoid parsing.

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew provided us more information and we'll work on recv. What
> people think about testing this stuff ?  btw, we don't have any
> regression test on this.

I'm intensely interested in this work; I consider it to be transformative.

I've *lightly* tested the jsonb/hstore functionality and so far
everything is working.

I still have concerns about the API.  Aside from the stuff I mentioned
upthread I find the API split between jsonb and hstore to be a little
odd; a lot of useful bits (for example, the @> operator) come via the
hstore type only.  So these types are joined at the hip for real work
which makes the diverging incomplete behaviors in functions like
populate_record() disconcerting.  Another point I'm struggling with is
what jsonb brings to the table that isn't covered either hstore or
json; working through a couple of cases I find myself not using the
jsonb functionality except as a 'hstore json formatter' which the json
type covers.  I'm probably being obtuse, but we have to be cautious
before plonking a couple of dozen extra functions in the public
schema.

merlin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb and nested hstore