Re: hint bit i/o reduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: hint bit i/o reduction
Date
Msg-id CAHyXU0wiBFVACDKji-33YJmWW7dz9N4hprTgM5UwSWOM3LfhiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to hint bit i/o reduction  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: hint bit i/o reduction
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 1) Keep track # times the last transaction id was repeatedly seen in
>> tqual.c (resetting as soon as a new xid was touched.  We can do this
>> just for xmin, or separately for both xmin and xmax.
>
> Will this be done when we see a new xid duricg scan of tuple, if yes then
> Won't this logic impact incase there are very few records per transaction in
> database.
> As in that case the new optimization won't help much, but it adds the new
> instructions.

Yes, but only in the unhinted case -- in oltp workloads tuples get
hinted fairly quickly so I doubt this would be a huge impact.  Hinted
scans will work exactly as they do now.  In the unhinted case for OLTP
a  few tests are added but that's noise compared to the other stuff
going on.

>> We can also try to be smart and disable
>> the 'avoid setting the hint bit' logic if the page is already dirty.
>
> Whats the benefit for not setting hint bit for a already dirty page.

Nothing -- we are disabling the '*avoid* setting the hint bit' logic
(double negative there).  In other words we would be disabling the
setting of hint bits if we see the same transaction many times in a
row, but only if the page isn't dirty.

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Honza Horak
Date:
Subject: Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets
Next
From: Honza Horak
Date:
Subject: Re: Ability to listen on two unix sockets