Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PvzHRRA_5O0R8KZCb1tVe1mBVPxFtmttXJnmuOmAegoWA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi Amit.

PSA the v21 patch for the Tablesync Solution1.

Main differences from v20:
+ Rebased to latest OSS HEAD @ 27/Jan
+ v21 is a merging of patches [v17] and [v20], which was made
necessary when it was found [ak0127] that the v20 usage of TEMPORARY
tablesync slots did not work correctly. v21 reverts to using PERMANENT
tablesync slots same as implemented in v17, while retaining other
review comment fixes made for v18, v19, v20.

----
[v17] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPt9%2Bg8qQR0kMC85nY-O4uDQxXboamZAYhHbvkebzC9fAQ%40mail.gmail.com
[v20] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuNwSujoL_dwa%3DTtozJ_vF%3DCnJxjgQTCmNBkazd8J1m-A%40mail.gmail.com
[ak0127] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LDsj9kw4FbWAw3CMHyVsjafgDum03cYy-wpGmor%3D8-1w%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Next
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log