On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:17 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > To cut a long story short, a tablesync worker CAN in fact end up
> > processing (e.g. apply_dispatch) streaming messages.
> > So the tablesync worker CAN get into the apply_handle_stream_commit.
> > And this scenario, albeit rare, will crash.
> >
>
> Thank you for reproducing this issue. Dilip, Peter, is anyone of you
> interested in writing a fix for this?
Hi Amit.
FYI - Sorry, I am away/offline for the next 5 days.
However, if this bug still remains unfixed after next Tuesday then I
can look at it then.
---
IIUC there are 2 options:
1) Disallow streaming for the tablesync worker.
2) Make streaming work for the tablesync worker.
I prefer option (a) not only because of the KISS principle, but also
because this is how the tablesync worker was previously thought to
behave anyway. I expect this fix may be like the code that Dilip
already posted [1]
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFiTN-uUgKpfdbwSGnn3db3mMQAeviOhQvGWE_pC9icZF7VDKg%40mail.gmail.com
OTOH, option (b) fix may or may not be possible (I don't know), but I
have doubts that it is worthwhile to consider making a special fix for
a scenario which so far has never been reproduced outside of the
debugger.
--
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
