Re: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PukNh_HsN1Au1p9YhG5KCOr3dH5jnwm=RmeX75BOtXTEg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: row filtering for logical replication  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: row filtering for logical replication  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
PSA my new incremental patch (v28-0002) that introduces row filter
validation for the publish mode "delete". The validation requires that
any columns referred to in the filter expression must also be part of
REPLICA IDENTITY or PK.

[This v28-0001 is identical to the most recently posted rebased base
patch. It is included again here only so the cfbot will be happy]

~~

A requirement for some filter validation like this has been mentioned
several times in this thread [1][2][3][4][5].

I also added some test code for various kinds of replica identity.

A couple of existing tests had to be modified so they could continue
to work  (e.g. changed publish = "insert" or REPLICA IDENTITY FULL)

Feedback is welcome.

~~

NOTE: This validation currently only checks when the filters are first
created. Probably there are many other scenarios that need to be
properly handled. What to do if something which impacts the existing
filter is changed?

e.g.
- what if the user changes the publish parameter using ALTER
PUBLICATION set (publish="delete") etc?
- what if the user changes the replication identity?
- what if the user changes the filter using ALTER PUBLICATION in a way
that is no longer compatible with the necessary cols?
- what if the user changes the table (e.g. removes a column referred
to by a filter)?
- what if the user changes a referred column name?
- more...

(None of those are addressed yet - thoughts?)

------

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/92e5587d-28b8-5849-2374-5ca3863256f1%402ndquadrant.com
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JL2q%2BHENgiCf1HLRU7nD9jCcttB9sEqV1tech4mMv_0A%40mail.gmail.com
[3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202107132106.wvjgvjgcyezo%40alvherre.pgsql
[4] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202107141452.edncq4ot5zkg%40alvherre.pgsql
[5] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Kyax-qnVPcXzODu3JmA4vtgAjUSYPUK1Pm3vBL5gC81g%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Show redo LSN in checkpoint logs
Next
From: Dinesh Chemuduru
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] new diagnostic items for the dynamic sql