Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PuDJToG=V-ogTi9_6fnhhn2S0+sVRGPynhcf9mEh0Q=LA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns  (Rajendra Kumar Dangwal <dangwalrajendra888@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
IIUC, previously there was a subscriber side option
'include_generated_columns', but now since v30* there is a publisher
side option 'publish_generated_columns'.

Fair enough, but in the v30* patches I can still see remnants of the
old name 'include_generated_columns' all over the place:
- in the commit message
- in the code (struct field names, param names etc)
- in the comments
- in the docs

If the decision is to call the new PUBLICATION option
'publish_generated_columns', then can't we please use that one name
*everywhere* -- e.g. replace all cases where any old name is still
lurking?

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Retire support for OpenSSL 1.1.1 due to raised API requirements