Re: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Ptts6pTV3z-_qDoEU8yfQuk7Q7c=cV5v7FXHuhDVN9qFg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 1:24 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
...

> We also need to research how to integrate the initial schema
> synchronization with tablesync workers.  We have a PoC patch[2].
>
> Regards,
>
> [1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Logical_replication_of_DDLs#Initial_Schema_Sync
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoCdfg506__qKz%2BHX8vqfdyKgQ5qeehgqq9bi1L-6p5Pwg%40mail.gmail.com
>

FYI -- the PoC patch fails to apply using HEAD fetched today.

git apply ../patches_misc/0001-Poc-initial-table-structure-synchronization-in-logic.patch
error: patch failed: src/backend/replication/logical/tablesync.c:1245
error: src/backend/replication/logical/tablesync.c: patch does not apply

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Support to define custom wait events for extensions
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow pg_archivecleanup to remove backup history files