On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:29 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, at 5:37 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> Yeah, it seems we have overlooked this point. I think we can do this
> just for HEAD but as the feature is introduced in PG-15 so there is no
> harm in pushing it to PG-15 as well especially because it is a
> straightforward change. What do you or others think?
>
> No objection. It is a good thing for future backpatches.
>
Since there is no function change or bugfix here I thought it was only
applicable for HEAD. This change is almost in the same category as a
code comment typo patch - do those normally get backpatched? - maybe
follow the same convention here. OTOH, if you think it may be helpful
for future backpatches then I am also fine if you wanted to push it to
PG15.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
