Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PtR85_yD-jJ08+ma5EsS6SEgAahRmXH7dsGA=ornhKAsA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 5:47 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:29:56PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > We can look at it from a different angle which is that the
> > FreePublication(s) relies on how the knowledge of Publication
> > structure is built. So, it doesn't look weird if we think from that
> > angle.
>
> OK, I can live with that on all the stable branches with an extra
> list free rather than a deep list free.
>
> I agree that the memory handling of this whole area needs some rework
> to make such leaks harder to introduce in the WAL sender.  Still,
> let's first solve the problem at hand :)
>
> So how about the attached that introduces a FreePublication() matching
> with GetPublication(), used to do the cleanup?  Feel free to comment.
> --

Perhaps the patch can use foreach_ptr macro instead of foreach?

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: speedup ALTER TABLE ADD CHECK CONSTRAINT.
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation