Re: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Pt99_343ZQKy--sDSE8RsWL_=BymxvNh0hEmF8HiOHeoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: row filtering for logical replication  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:33 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I finally had time to take a closer look at the patch again, so here's
> some review comments. The thread is moving fast, so chances are some of
> the comments are obsolete or were already raised in the past.
>
...
> 11) extra (unnecessary) parens in the deparsed expression
>
> test=# alter publication p add table t where ((b < 100) and (c < 100));
> ALTER PUBLICATION
> test=# \dRp+ p
>                                Publication p
>   Owner | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root
> -------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------
>   user  | f          | t       | t       | t       | t         | f
> Tables:
>      "public.t" WHERE (((b < 100) AND (c < 100)))
>

Euler's fix for this was integrated into v45 [1]

------
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFPTHDYB4nbxCMAFQGowJtDf7E6uBc%3D%3D_HupBKy7MaMhM%2B9QQA%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Use generation context to speed up tuplesorts
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows.