Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PsSTmpaFv8EZfyrXpi+e6Ft3bE5T6M_SOcVJB+hTKPc8w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2  (Timur Magomedov <t.magomedov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:30 PM Timur Magomedov
<t.magomedov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
> I've noticed there are changes in Postgres code v4 patch that rollback
> the commit [1]. That commit optimizes TupleHashEntryData struct size
> and amount of memory allocations which improves performance (see
> discussion [2]).
> Can we use leave TupleHashEntryData as is and make new VCI-specific
> struct that contains TupleHashEntryData member and an additional
> pointer or make VCI use TupleHashEntryGetAdditional()?
>

Thanks for the report. This is fixed in v6.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Possibly hard-to-read message
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Question on error code selection in conflict detection