Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
Subject Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id CAHg+QDcw6er6maVHq5PGR2t7NePXMWD9Vih9TRE=8Z=LDxOE9w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication
List pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 8:29 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 08:14:10AM -0800, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM wrote:
>     2. Process proc die immediately when a backend is waiting for sync
>     replication acknowledgement, as it does today, however, upon restart,
>     don't open up for business (don't accept ready-only connections)
>     unless the sync standbys have caught up.
>
>
> Are you planning to block connections or queries to the database? It would be
> good to allow connections and let them query the monitoring views but block the
> queries until sync standby have caught up. Otherwise, this leaves a monitoring
> hole. In cloud, I presume superusers are allowed to connect and monitor (end
> customers are not the role members and can't query the data). The same can't be
> true for all the installations. Could you please add more details on your
> approach?

I think ALTER SYSTEM should be allowed, particularly so you can modify
synchronous_standby_names, no?

Yes, Change in synchronous_standby_names is expected in this situation. IMHO, blocking all the connections is not a recommended approach.



--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

Embrace your flaws.  They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15