Re: [GENERAL] Securing Information - Mailing list pgsql-general

From jesusthefrog
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Securing Information
Date
Msg-id CAH_wARt+F5fJN8t1v+uYJpeJXZd6w8v_cD0WJdRknaAWS9TrYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Securing Information  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general

True. In our environment we have other layers to deal with network security which covers us for encryption of a data as it's transmitted, and you definitely should do that, but that's not something a DBA would normally be concerned with.
And given that he said that the machine may be standalone, I would suspect that there would be a person at a directly (or nearly-directly) connected terminal, possibly via a web app. If you're going to, for example, email the data to someone, then it also has to be encrypted at that time, but that would need to be re-encrypted with a method the receiver would be able to decrypt anyway.

In any case I recommend reading the consolidated HIPAA Privacy Act regulations (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/administrative/combined/hipaa-simplification-201303.pdf).

I'm not entirely sure of the applicability of the Privacy Act of 1974 to non-government-affiliated computers/networks, but it can't hurt to read through that regulation for guidance as well. (https://gsa.gov/portal/mediaId/252231/fileName/CIO_P_21001I__CHGE_1_GSA_Information_Technology_%28IT%29_Security_Policy__%28Signed_on_10-20-2015%29.action page 35).

--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
  Version: 3.12
  GIT d- s+ a- C++++ L+++ S++ B+ P++>++++ E++ W+++
  N o? K- !w++++ O- M- V? PS++ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5+++
  X R+ tv b+++ DI++ D++ G+ e-- h- r++ y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Securing Information
Next
From: Clifford Snow
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] Help with Trigger