Re: Java 1.4 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Maciek Sakrejda
Subject Re: Java 1.4
Date
Msg-id CAH_hXRbe94g7J3ye0c09+9S9ERUUNm6bLmMSuawzLno0HjQ_Zg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Java 1.4  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
> It occurs to me that if we move to git then we can keep two branches
> active. One branch would support 1.4 for backpatches and the other
> branch would drop 1.4 support and new features would be developed on
> that line.

I assume you mean that 9.2 would have a "split" release (separate 1.4
support) and all the older active release branches would remain with a
single 1.4-compatible version and have backpatches from the new
1.4-compatible branch? That could work, but for what it's worth, I
think the best way to do this would be to drop 1.4 compatibility
entirely in the mainline development branch (e.g., with 9.2 the first
non-1.4-compatible release; I'd love to talk to anyone planning to
talk to 9.2 from Java 1.4), and keep all the existing release branches
compatible until we drop support.

---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso

1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Java 1.4
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Java 1.4