Re: GIT move - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Maciek Sakrejda
Subject Re: GIT move
Date
Msg-id CAH_hXRYAcYmaFVMrrfBZmOsdjGTOqnCtkRxhgqry45HroOshqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIT move  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: GIT move  (Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
>> Also, vaguely on this topic, I'm not sure if there's a formal plan for
>> methods of accepting patches (e.g., via github pull requests), but I
>> highly recommend that all patches be required to be rebased against
>> trunk/master, resulting in fast-forward merges into the main tree.
>> This makes history much simpler to follow (no merge nodes) without a
>> significant downside.
>>
>
> Currently the main project still requires a context patch as well

Good point. I'll see if I can dig up the discussion on the main
project's list and argue against following that here ;) (or maybe the
discussion will change my mind)--I think a rebased pull request
(squashed to a single changeset, if appropriate) is essentially a
fancier context patch.
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso

1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: GIT move
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: GIT move