Re: Master-slave failover question - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Athanasios | ZenGuard
Subject Re: Master-slave failover question
Date
Msg-id CAHPc5uRJNXBmo=+KtLeWimTm+KZiAkMCb1JjxYN4eRd_-BDz-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Master-slave failover question  (Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar@ashnik.com>)
Responses Re: Master-slave failover question  (Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar@ashnik.com>)
List pgsql-novice
Any sane values to it? This is what I am using right now (10 just to be on the safe side, the 5000 (!) is a repmgr requirement(!))

max_wal_senders = 10            # max number of walsender processes
wal_keep_segments = 5000        # in logfile segments, 16MB each; 0 disables





On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Sameer Kumar <sameer.kumar@ashnik.com> wrote:

If you are only relying on streaming replication (and not using archive shipping/hybrid replication), the probablity of 'catching-up' is as high as your wal_keep_segment.

Regards
Sameer

PS: Sent from my Mobile device. Pls ignore typo n abb


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Sameer Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Master-slave failover question
Next
From: Sameer Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Master-slave failover question